PhD step2: the research question and how can I answer it (is it possible to write a PhD on gnowsis?)
I will be blogging about my Semantic Web PhD for the next months, until I am finished. You will learn what I did in the last years and what I plan to do in the next months to write my thesis. Perhaps you can copy something for your own work or point me to information I missed - critique, positive and negative, is warmly welcome.
The topic of my PhD thesis is derived from my Diploma Thesis "The Gnowsis: Using Semantic Web techonologies to build a Semantic Desktop". The work I did in 2003 was to create a Semantic Web Server for a single user, on your desktop. So the desktop is turned into a Semantic Desktop. The abstract ends with:
Using the gnowsis prototype, which is a result of this work, applications have access to all important information stored in a single computer. Users are able to classify and structure their information in any way they want by creating bidirectional links between resources. A prototype information management tool GnoGno based on a wiki /weblog was built to explore this possibility.
So, what am I going to do for PhD? Continue! I got different remarks on that by others:
So, I am positive that my work is science. Coincidence, I googled for websites that are like mine today, stumbling across Dennis Quan. His thesis made with David Karger at MIT on Designing End User Information Environments Built on Semistructured Data Models is a good example of the direction I want to go: describing how to build Semantic Web environments for the real world. And I interpret Dennis' thesis in a way that you indeed can write a PhD thesis about implementation matters, half his thesis is about Adenine, Ozone and the RDF bits and pieces he created (which are very good, btw).
So the research question I have is on the borders between Semantic Web, Artificial Intelligence, and Knowledge Management:
If Personal Information Management is the main use of Personal Computers, why is then not part of the Operating System of the computers? Why does it only handle files and folders, and not Persons, Projects and Topics?
We need a system int he spirit of the memex - a personal extension of the brain. A system then be used to write down notes in a "new" way. My diploma thesis ended with the idea that Users are able to classify and structure their information in any way they want by creating bidirectional links between resources. But "Any Way" has to be specified further. We miss an answer to: how to write down information the best way, on a Semantic Desktop?
So my PhD will contain a roundtrip on the Semantic Desktop - the idea of a central server and applications around it - and then go into the Personal Information Model (PIMO) we use to manage information. At the end, I will shine light how to automatically generate the PIMO, something that is addressed a lot in our group.
The way to answer these questions and challenges is (for me) clear: Personal Information Management cannot be handled by a single applaction like MindManager of Microsoft Outlook. It has to include all information items that come into our attention during every day, it has to include my web-browsing, my e-mails, my project management tools, my co-workers, my employees and students, my project and my tasks there, my SVN commits, my papers, travel to conferences, giving talks, powerpoints, blog posts.
So it has to include all the applications in this chain: blogging, flickr, powerpoint, e-mail, MS-Word, etc etc. And what we did in gnowsis and the EPOS project, was to look that all these applications can be enhanced with plugins so that they can capture the information behind. What we need is a unified tagging scheme for each person, a "personal Technorati". If I use the tag "burning man 2006" in delicious, I will also use it on flickr, and on my e-mails. so simple - I am always the same person, so independent of application, my PIMO is the same. Simple in theory, tricky in practice.
practice will follow.
The topic of my PhD thesis is derived from my Diploma Thesis "The Gnowsis: Using Semantic Web techonologies to build a Semantic Desktop". The work I did in 2003 was to create a Semantic Web Server for a single user, on your desktop. So the desktop is turned into a Semantic Desktop. The abstract ends with:
Using the gnowsis prototype, which is a result of this work, applications have access to all important information stored in a single computer. Users are able to classify and structure their information in any way they want by creating bidirectional links between resources. A prototype information management tool GnoGno based on a wiki /weblog was built to explore this possibility.
So, what am I going to do for PhD? Continue! I got different remarks on that by others:
- That was a diploma thesis? After reading it, I thought it was your PhD
- Just write down, we will see then...
- You can never write a thesis about an implementation, thats not science
So, I am positive that my work is science. Coincidence, I googled for websites that are like mine today, stumbling across Dennis Quan. His thesis made with David Karger at MIT on Designing End User Information Environments Built on Semistructured Data Models is a good example of the direction I want to go: describing how to build Semantic Web environments for the real world. And I interpret Dennis' thesis in a way that you indeed can write a PhD thesis about implementation matters, half his thesis is about Adenine, Ozone and the RDF bits and pieces he created (which are very good, btw).
So the research question I have is on the borders between Semantic Web, Artificial Intelligence, and Knowledge Management:
If Personal Information Management is the main use of Personal Computers, why is then not part of the Operating System of the computers? Why does it only handle files and folders, and not Persons, Projects and Topics?
We need a system int he spirit of the memex - a personal extension of the brain. A system then be used to write down notes in a "new" way. My diploma thesis ended with the idea that Users are able to classify and structure their information in any way they want by creating bidirectional links between resources. But "Any Way" has to be specified further. We miss an answer to: how to write down information the best way, on a Semantic Desktop?
So my PhD will contain a roundtrip on the Semantic Desktop - the idea of a central server and applications around it - and then go into the Personal Information Model (PIMO) we use to manage information. At the end, I will shine light how to automatically generate the PIMO, something that is addressed a lot in our group.
The way to answer these questions and challenges is (for me) clear: Personal Information Management cannot be handled by a single applaction like MindManager of Microsoft Outlook. It has to include all information items that come into our attention during every day, it has to include my web-browsing, my e-mails, my project management tools, my co-workers, my employees and students, my project and my tasks there, my SVN commits, my papers, travel to conferences, giving talks, powerpoints, blog posts.
So it has to include all the applications in this chain: blogging, flickr, powerpoint, e-mail, MS-Word, etc etc. And what we did in gnowsis and the EPOS project, was to look that all these applications can be enhanced with plugins so that they can capture the information behind. What we need is a unified tagging scheme for each person, a "personal Technorati". If I use the tag "burning man 2006" in delicious, I will also use it on flickr, and on my e-mails. so simple - I am always the same person, so independent of application, my PIMO is the same. Simple in theory, tricky in practice.
practice will follow.
leobard - 1. Nov, 15:41
|
Argey (guest) - 4. Nov, 05:10
3D mindmapping goes further for information organization
Have you looked at 3D Topicscape (http://www.topicscape.com/)? It can take over when a mindmap gets too large and was designed specifically for storing information of all types but using a mindmapping or concept mapping approach. It also tackles the hoary old problem of storing items that really need to go in several places, but without making copies that can get out of line. It's a new product and is developing fast.
george22 - 19. Nov, 07:52
Have you looked at 3D Topicscape (http://www.topicscape.com/)? It can take over when a mindmap gets too large and was designed specifically for storing information of all types but using a mindmapping or concept mapping approach. It also tackles the hoary old problem of storing items that really need to go in several places, but without making copies that can get out of line. It's a new product and is developing fast.cheap winter jackets for women / / winter running jacket / / maternity winter jackets / / vintage trench coat / / trench coat uk / / buy trench coat / / cropped trench coat / / mens trench coats on sale / /
Trackback URL:
https://leobard.twoday.net/stories/2879108/modTrackback
Trackbacks for this Story
leobard.twoday.net - 28. Nov, 01:51
PhD step3: writing the PhD
People with a good memory (who aren't... [read more]
Software vs. O/S
"If Personal Information Management is the main use of Personal Computers, why is then not part of the Operating System of the computers? Why does it only handle files and folders, and not Persons, Projects and Topics?"
The answer is the same as if you were asking why the O/S layer isn't geared towards games, or web-browsing. It's not the role of the O/S to specialize, it's the role of the O/S to provide the basis for software to be developed that handles the specialization. There was a time when there were machines with such specialized operating systems: we called them routers, telephony switches, and game consoles. But even the developers of those platforms are starting to move more towards general O/S architecture. Companies are gradually adopting things like Linux under the hood, then writing what they need on top of that. The time may come when you see native semantic concepts rolled into the O/S layer, but only when the nature of operating systems themselves moves in a more semantic direction.