Wednesday, 6. August 2008

Gender and Subjective Views in the Semantic Web

You know the Semantic Web is mature when it is subject to gender studies.

Marion Fugléwicz-Bren (the public relations representative of semantic web company) interviewed Corinna Bath, a researcher and lecturer, about gender studies and Semantic Web.

The arguments are valid, going along the lines that social group and background influence the interpretation of reality. Its interesting to see what the problems are, and possible solitions, from her view:

three quotes I need for an argument:
Another line of thinking about gender and the Semantic Web is feminist epistemology, which questions traditional approaches in pointing out that there is no “real meaning”. According to these findings knowledge is always historically and culturally situated.
Hence, in contrast to its own agenda CYC ignores minority views, quieter voices, and allows the dominant voice to speak for everyone, which seems highly problematic.
Even the modelling concepts themselves should be questioned as Cecile Crutzen suggest, since e.g. the class concept and the inheritance concept lack to represent social processes, because of limited formal expressiveness for conflict, change and fluidity. Such an ontology abstracts from human sociality, situated action and real meaning construction processes.

The views are also supported by constructivistic philosophy (which I basically agree with and adhere to in my own work on Personal Information Models) with the core principle that reality is constructed inside the individual based on sensory input.

The suggestion to contextualize statements and ontologies is also right. Technial there are two problems: inference and identification. The problem is that inference as-is-now is already a hard problem, and using localized/contextualized ontologies as done by Stefan Decker and Michael Sintek in their 2002 Micro-Inference approach in TRIPLE (or by Nepomuk's NRL theory) makes the problem even harder.
Second, if a user would benefit from a contextualized ontology, the user would have to identify himself and give away information about his social context, gender, sexuality, nationality, preferences, which is a privacy problem.

So - who comes up with a solution? TRIPLE with FOAF and SIOC?
QR barcode by i-nigma.com/CreateBarcodes
Stefano Bertolo (guest) - 31. Aug, 20:22

CYC quote

The quote about CYC is demonstrably incorrect: CYC implements a hierarchy of contexts (known in CYC as 'microtheories') that would allow any minority to define and use its worldview. I suggest Corinna should familiarize herself with this mechanism by studying the documentation at opencyc.org

leobard - 9. Sep, 10:42

That was known

I asked Corinna about that and she said she cited an older paper to illustrate the general point, and didn't cite some newer work on microtheories and gender because it didn't fit into an interview context.

read here
http://leobard.twoday.net/stories/5178859/

Trackback URL:
https://leobard.twoday.net/stories/5106972/modTrackback

icon

semantic weltbild 2.0

Building the Semantic Web is easier together

and then...

foaf explorer
foaf

Geo Visitors Map
I am a hard bloggin' scientist. Read the Manifesto.
www.flickr.com
lebard's photos More of lebard's photos
Skype Me™!

Search

 

Users Status

You are not logged in.

I support

Wikipedia Affiliate Button

Archive

August 2008
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 2 
 3 
 5 
 7 
 9 
10
12
14
15
16
17
19
21
22
23
24
25
29
30
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Credits


austriaca
Chucknorrism
digitalcouch
gnowsis
Jesus
NeueHeimat
route planning
SemWeb
travel
zoot
Profil
Logout
Subscribe Weblog